Revisiting Barack Obama's Promise to America... Seven TRILLION In New Debt Later...

 Obama Feb, 2009

...today I’m pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office. This will not be easy. It will require us to make difficult decisions and face challenges we’ve long neglected. But I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay — and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control.

obamacare - Who Is Hurt?

     When one looks across the landscape of the idiotic obamacare roll out, it is apparent that the intent of this bill is, and always was, the end of the middle class and the permanent subjugation of all but the very rich.
 
     As people open their mail and discover the enormous increases of their monthly health insurance premiums for the coming year, the silence of the vicious left wing is appalling. When Nancy Pelosi said, "You HAVE TO pass the bill, to find out what's in it," she meant that literally because the 3,000 pages of law, followed by 400,000 pages of regulations is a map of how the government will hold you down, take your money, steal your liberty and force you into poverty, through trillions in wasteful spending, SWAT team enforcement and gun point intimidation.
 
     As reports show the first implementation efforts, which were funded at $1 billion, have serious financial accountability lapses, the money grab that accompanies this abortion of a law are becoming more and more obvious. The creation of scores of SWAT Teams specifically for the purpose of "enforcement" of obamacare, should infuriate and frighten people with enough sense to see the totalitarian police state forming around us.
     As Senate leader, Harry Reid and his partners in crime, John McCain and Nancy Pelosi shriek about Ted Cruz, voters increasingly turn their backs on the progressive left and find their voices ignored, attacked and threatened. obamacare has the potential to become the ultimate coups. Citizens must speak out, refuse to comply, make your representatives listen and never stop speaking, before it becomes illegal to criticize the obama regime.
    

As The Federal Government Seizes Personal Liberty, Federal Employees Incomes Rise Dramatically

     In a not so surprising discovery, we find out that personal income of those who work FOR the taxpayers have risen during the time that personal income of Americans that work in the proivate sector have dropped steadily.
     American incomes have tumbled over the last decade. But for many people in Washington, D.C., it’s been something of a party.
     The income of the typical D.C. household rose 23.3% between 2000 and 2012 to an inflation-adjusted $66,583, according to the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, its most comprehensive snapshot of America’s demographic, social and economic trends. During this period, median household incomes for the nation as a whole dropped 6.6% — from $55,030 to $51,371. The state of Mississippi, which had one of the biggest declines, dropped 15% to $37,095: Nearly one in three people there have an income that is near the poverty line.
     How has Obama style socialism benefited you?

Are These The Times That Try Obama's Soul?

     As the reality of an unhappy electorate, coming into a dangerous 2014, mid-term election, sober up the all out, all socialist democrat party, election minded liberals are showing a willingness to defy the Obama agenda of debt, spending, foreign weakness and media manipulation. Without blind obedience, the second term agenda will suffer.
     Thankfully.
     With a national media on their knees begging to obey him, Barack Obama won virtually every one of his pet projects, against the will of the voter. With 100% Senate democratic following, and just barely enough Congressional democrats falling in line, Obama force fed the disastrous obamacare bill thru without a single republican vote, proving that there was just enough vote fraud, at the senate level, to make sure there would be 60 votes on Christmas Eve, to saddle tax payers with the worst written, least thought out, most destructive bill ever passed.
      Now that the real truth about obamacare and its insidious tendrils are becoming impossible to cover up, people are standing up and speaking above the din of the knee pad wearing media and public support for obamacare and Obama are taking a dramatic hit.
      Throughout Obama's first term the media REFUSED to allow a single shred of truth to be printed that even hinted at dissatisfaction with their hero. Stories were routinely spiked, reporters reassigned, or relieved of their job for submitting anything that resembled non-compliance with the wishes of the regime. Those who failed to conform were singled out by everyone from msnbc to the IRS, for persecution. The first amendment has been routinely ignored as administration hacks attacked anyone who wouldn't walk the line drawn by the white house.
      In the fifth year of obama's reign too many people simply stopped tuning in, logging on, or listening to the government controlled voices of the media and profits were severely reduced. The regime countered by hiring 15 "friendly" journalists away from networks and installing them on the regime's staff, at enormous taxpayer expense, to influence the press even more. A regime that promised to be the most open and transparent in history, has all but disappeared behind locked doors, secret orders and outright lies, to avoid any hint of the truth, as long as possible.

      Socialist Senator recently summed it up. "If you read the papers, you almost think the Republicans are in control,” said Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont, an independent who caucuses with Democrats and vigorously opposed Mr. Summers until he withdrew from consideration. “They’re constantly on the offensive. Democrats are on the defensive.”

The lack of strong leadership, he added, has created a vacuum. “I think you’re going to see more independents saying, ‘Mr. President, we look forward to working with you, but we’re not simply going to accept your leadership and your ideas,’ ” he said. “ ‘We’re not going to follow you. You’re going to have to work with us.’ ” 

      If the USA is to survive three more years of Obama's lack of decency, leadership, honesty and integrity, far more elected officials will have to find the encourage to tell the truth and ignore the empty headed criticism from the likes of John McCain, Diane Feinstein and Lindsey Graham. America needs more TEA and less Socialism.

Obama, thy name is HYPOCRITE

In a world where up is down and right is wrong, We the TEA Party of Florida are praying for all those hurt and hurting after today's shooting in Washington, D.C.

NY Times Accuses Conservative - TEA Party Members of Being TERRORISTS

A video (from the Daily Caller) reveals the Republican Party's real angst about the Tea Party.
David Brooks (the Gray Lady's idea of a housebroken conservative) laments, to PBS's Judy Woodruff that Republican legislators like Ted Cruz aren't "normal members. . . going to Congress to create coalitions, make alliances and . . . pass a lot of legislation" while interesting themselves in "the perks . . . the leadership has to offer." Indeed, Brooks asserts, "They're not [real] legislators" at all -- just obstructionists "who want to stop things."
 
All of which conversely implies Brooks believes real legislators are ones who go to Congress only because they can pass lots of legislation, create coalitions, make alliances, interest themselves in the perks the leadership has to offer, avoid obstructionism, and fail to stop anything.
"The Tea Party types," says Brooks, are "running against the Republican establishment[,] . . . having a very obstructive role, and making John Boehner's life even more difficult." Indeed, Brooks moans, they have no real policy goals at all and "Their [only] object is to take over the Republican Party."
Let's devoutly hope Brooks knows whereof he speaks. One could hardly ask for a better divination of what the Tea Party's real aspiration should be than Brooks' denunciation of Ted Cruz and what Mark Shields (Brooks' Democratic "sparring partner" in the video) disparages as "these people . . . the Tea Party people . . . the ruin or rule people -- mostly ruin because they're not really interested in ruling . . . " Let's hope so because the present establishment duopoly which is, in fact, very much interested in ruinously ruling constitutes, in reality, little more than a one-party state in which either party, if the other didn't exist, would have to invent it in order merely to preserve the illusion of a two-party state subject to substantive political opposition.
In political reality, there has in living memory been no conservative political party in the United States. There is none now; and, absent reforming the Republican Party or creating a third party, there will be none in the future.
The Republican Party isn't the Democratic Party's conservative opposition. Had it been, government spending at all levels wouldn't now equal almost 40% of the nation's gross domestic product (versus under 10% a century ago), over 40% of the citizenry wouldn't now be receiving some type of government assistance (versus virtually none a century ago), Federal regulations alone wouldn't now comprise more than 200 volumes occupying about 20 feet of shelf space (versus none a century ago), and the Federal debt alone wouldn't now equal almost 110% of the nation's gross domestic product (versus close to none a century ago).
Creating coalitions, making alliances, passing lots of legislation, and enjoying the leadership's perks (i.e., for Brooks the ideal behavior of normal Congressmen) have, in other words, been the rule which has already ruined the Republic and will soon enough complete its destruction unless the "Tea Party types" whom both Brooks and Shields so scorn can manage in time to create a substantive political opposition which, in fact, returns the Republic to something like at least a genuine two-party state. It's not only time to, in Brooks' words, "stop things." Indeed, it's time to reverse things. And who -- other than Brooks, Shields, and their ilk --would believe legislation reversing the unconstitutional governance which has created a collectivist state is neither legislation per se nor the prerogative of normal congressmen in a representative Republic?
Does "the rise of Ted Cruz-ism" (Brooks' phrase for "the Tea Party types") really mean "to take over the Republican Party" as Brooks bemoans? We'd better hope so if we aspire ever again to become anything like free men with free markets in a representative Republic constitutionally governed.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/09/terrorized_by_the_tea_party.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook#ixzz2f6mWH9gj

2013 Conflict in Syria Blamed on Drought Caused by Global Warming??

Flashback 1933: ‘YO-YO BANNED IN SYRIA – Blamed For Drought By Moslems’

Global warming blamed for more maladies.
Real Science reaction: 'In 1933, drought was blamed on Yo-Yos. Eighty years later, modern Yo-Yos blame drought on CO2'
Latest science refutes global warming/drought claims: Globally, 'there has been little change in drought over the past 60 years.'

By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotSeptember 6, 2013 10:12 PM

(Follow Climate Depot on Twitter)
As international tensions heat up over Syria, many global warming activists are trying to capitalize on the situation by blaming man-made global warming for the conflict. Specifically climate change promoters are blaming recent droughts on global warming.
How Climate Change Warmed Syria Up for War — Drought allegedly caused by global warming helped create conflict – ‘So this is our mess too. We’re still cranking away at the carbon pump, and no nation is as culpable as the U.S.’ – William Polk, an ex-US State Department advisor, has written a meticulously detailed account of the genesis of the conflict over at The Atlantic..
Warmist Claim: ‘How Climate Change Primed Syria for War’ — ‘Drought devastated the country from 2006 to 2011′ – ’Climate change, however, is adding a new dynamic to the game. This is why the US military has identified climate change as a ‘threat multiplier’.
Drought Helped Spark Syria’s Civil War — Is it One of Many Climate Wars to Come? | Connecting the Dots, Q&A, What Matters Today | BillMoyers.com
Bill Moyers Tweeted: ‘Climate change in Syria helped spark the civil war there. Which country is next?’ – Meteorologist Dr. Ryan Maue mocked Moyers: ‘Fighting global warming on par with terrorism and nuclear proliferation. WMD isn’t Sarin gas, it’s carbon dioxide’ 
#
Seeking the cause of droughts is Syria in not without historical  precedent. In a January 23, 1933 news article,  Yo Yo’s were banned in Syria because they were also “blamed for drought.” See: Have we progressed?! 2013: Warmists blame Syrian drought on man-made global warming — Flashback 1933: ‘YO-YO BANNED IN SYRIA – Blamed For Drought By Moslems’ – Real Science reaction: ‘In 1933, Syrian experts blamed drought on the use of Yo-Yos. 

So it seems that every malady under the Sun is now blamed on global warming, the modern  version  of the Yo Yo attribution. See: Climate Depot’s Morano on Fox News Mocking Gore’s ‘Climate Astrology’: ‘This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar’ – Morano: ‘There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens ‘proves’ their case…Man-made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope’ (See also: Have we advanced? ‘Aztec priests encouraged people to sacrifice blood to the gods’ to end severe drought in 1450 – ‘Sacrificed thousands of people in a few weeks’)
The current science behind droughts and man-made global warming fails to provide a scientific  justification  for global warming activists. See: PROF. ROGER PIELKE JR: TESTIMONY ON THE CURRENT STATE OF WEATHER EXTREMES: ‘It is misleading, and just plain incorrect, to claim that disasters associated with hurricanes, tornadoes, floods or droughts have increased on climate timescales either in the United States or globally’ -

Drought has “for the most part, become shorter, less frequent, and cover a smaller portion of the U. S. over the last century.” Globally, “there has been little change in drought over the past 60 years.”

New Report: ‘Extreme Weather Report 2012′: ‘Latest peer-reviewed studies, data & analyses undermine claims that current weather is ‘unprecedented’ or a ‘new normal’

1839 Shock News: Syria Has Been Having Droughts For Thousands Of Years
Even the readers of the New York Times refuse to accept the war/global warming assertions: see: ‘Climate change, our top global challenge, is on track to kill many millions this century, but not from wars’ – ’Is There a Link Between Weather and War?’ Published: September 6, 2012: To the Editor: Re “Weather and Violence” (Sunday Review, Sept. 1): Marshall Burke, Solomon Hsiang and Edward Miguel argue that climate change could increase violent group conflicts by 50 percent in the next 50 years. But I take strong issue with their starting point for this rise: “a planet already awash in conflict.” As Ross Douthat notes in his column on an adjacent page (“War, What Is It Good For?”), the world is actually “more at peace than at any point in human history … with fewer invasions, fewer war crimes, fewer massacres than in the past.” – Starting from today’s low levels, a 50 percent rise over 50 years hardly registers. After all, world total battle fatalities jumped 65 percent just in 2011 to 2012 because of Syria, but remain less than one-fifth of the average level of the 1980s. Climate change, our top global challenge, is on track to kill many millions this century, but not from wars. JOSHUA S. GOLDSTEIN - Amherst, Mass., Sept. 1, 2013  The writer, a research scholar at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, is the author of “Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide.”

Related Links: 
How Climate Change Warmed Syria Up for War — Drought allegedly caused by global warming helped create conflict – ‘So this is our mess too. We’re still cranking away at the carbon pump, and no nation is as culpable as the U.S.’ – William Polk, an ex-US State Department advisor, has written a meticulously detailed account of the genesis of the conflict over at The Atlantic…”Syria has been convulsed by civil war since climate change came to Syria with a vengeance,” Polk writes. ”Drought devastated the country from 2006 to 2011. Rainfall in most of the country fell below eight inches (20 cm) a year, the absolute minimum needed to sustain un-irrigated farming. Desperate for water, farmers began to tap aquifers with tens of thousands of new well.  But, as they did, the water table quickly dropped to a level below which their pumps could lift it.”  – So this is our mess too. We’re still cranking away at the carbon pump, and no nation is as culpable as the United States—and as long as we do, we’ll be at least in some small part, responsible for the starving, rioting masses all the way across the globe. If we’re so dead set on intervention, maybe we should be focusing less on missiles and more on clean energy.
Warmist Claim: ‘How Climate Change Primed Syria for War’ — ‘Drought devastated the country from 2006 to 2011′ – ’Climate change, however, is adding a new dynamic to the game. This is why the US military has identified climate change as a ‘threat multiplier’. — ‘Climate change makes events such as the Russian Heat wave, Pakistan floods, the 2003 European heat wave, and 2011 Texas drought, and all their attendant ripple effects,  more likely.’
Not Syria-ous: Kerry takes break from war drums to push global warming at climate conference: ‘The science is clear. It is irrefutable and it is alarming’
A UN IPCC Scientist’s New Study! ‘Global Warming Sparks Fistfights & War, Researchers Say’: ‘Will systematically increase the risk of many types of conflict ranging from barroom brawls & rape to civil wars & international disputes’ — Climate Depot Responds

Climate Depot’s Round up Debunks Global Warming/War claims: Flashback: Study Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: Cold spells were dark times in Eastern Europe: ‘Cooler periods coincided with conflicts and disease outbreaks’
Flashback: Debunked: the ‘climate change causes wars’ myth –Peer-reviewed paper ‘thoroughly eviscerates’ climate war claims — ‘The primary causes of civil war are political, not environmental’
Flashback: ‘A total takedown’ of myth by the Center for Strategic and International Studies — ‘Since the dawn of civilization, warmer eras have meant fewer wars
More  debunking  here.
Rise In Violence Linked To Poor Statistics. Or Climate Change: ‘The most charitable way to describe the result is complete and utter nonsense’ – 

Statistician Dr. Matt Briggs: ‘Whatever weather or climate variable “worked” was the one they used to predict whatever kind of “violence” could be quantified. The whole thing was then duct-taped together and lathered with colorful Bondo to conceal the gaping holes in commonsense

John "Swift Boat" Kerry Proclaims He Has A "High Degree" of Confidence in Chemical Attack Evidence

Seriously?

Facts Don't Align With the AGENDA of President Obama

 
     As everyone from Nancy Pelosi to Eric Cantor and John Boehner, beat the drum for more bombing, shooting and killing, at great expense to American taxpayers, those with a longer memory, than partisan agenda remember the inconvenient facts that belie the agenda of Barack Obama.
     Russia has called on Turkey to share its findings in the case of Syrian rebels who were seized on the Turkish-Syrian border with a 2kg cylinder full of nerve gas sarin.
 http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/151261/russia-asks-turkey-for-info-on-sarin-terrorists.html
 
     As recently as June 6, 2013, a scant three months ago, Russia requested details from Turskish officials of the capture of Syrian rebels with SARAN Nerve Gas, yet president Obama steadfastly refuses to examine the record, so desperate is he to make the middle east safer for muslim terrorists.
 

      During a meeting at the White House, the president assured Senator John McCain that after months of delay the US was meeting its commitment to back moderate elements of the opposition.

Mr Obama said that a 50-man cell, believed to have been trained by US special forces in Jordan, was making its way across the border into Syria, according to the New York Times.
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10283758/First-Syria-rebels-armed-and-trained-by-CIA-on-way-to-battlefield.html
      So proud of his war making power, the president has briefed Congress that the FIRST unit of CIA trained rebels is on its way to Syria to undermine the current government. It strikes many as odd that the president never once mentioned any acts of aggression against Coptic Christians, when making his case for military strikes against Syria, only acts committed against muslims.