Sunday, January 26, 2014

Chuck Schummer, Always A TEA Party Enemy, Suggests Using the IRS and "Election Reform" to "Crush" the TEA Party

     As the TEA Party continues to blunt the forward march of Socialism and Progressive Marxism, across America, hard line leftists continue to demand the government put a stop to free elections and freedom of speech. The latest perpetrator of this outrageous offense against freedom is NY Senator Chuck Schummer.
 http://www.cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/images/charles_schumer_ap--300x300_1.jpg?1363715235
     In his rant against the TEA Party and free elections, Schummer said that the democrat party and government MUST -



-- "stop playing defense and go on offense when it comes to the need for government. We must state loudly and repeatedly that we believe government is often a necessary force for good."

-- Second, Democrats in 2014 -- an election  year -- must focus "on four or five simple but compelling examples of where government can help the average family. (He mentioned raising the minimum wage, paying for college with a "simple, concerete government-funded program," increasing aid for K-12 education,infrastructure spending, equal pay for women, and fair trade.)

-- The third way to "constructively channel frustrations," Schumer said, "is to address the damage done by the Supreme Court's Citizen United decision," which created "huge holes in our campaign finance laws. ...Obviously, the Tea Party elites gained extraordinary influence by being able to funnel millions of dollars into campaigns with ads that distort the truth and attack government."

Schumer said although the House is controlled by Republicans, "there are many things that can be done administratively by the IRS and other government agencies -- we must redouble those efforts immediately."
 

Schumer Suggests 'Electoral Reform' As Way to 'Lessen the Grip of the Tea Party'

January 24, 2014 - 9:54 AM
Schumer: Democrats Must 'Exploit' Tea Party Weakness to 'Turn American Politics Around'


Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) AP Photo
(CNSNews.com) - Although the tea party's influence is "undeniable," it is not inevitable -- and it must be crushed for the good of the nation, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) argued in a long political speech on Thursday.

"They've won elections, stymied Democratic priorities and taken a sledgehammer to programs that are important to tens of millions of Americans," he complained.

Among other recommendations, Schumer suggested an IRS crackdown on funding for tea party groups. "We have to look at electoral reform," he said.

"Our very electoral structure has been rigged to favor tea party candidates in Republican primaries, even when the district or the state may not be that red."

Schumer said "the tea party machine" has a particularly strong influence on Republican primaries, partly because the far right turns out to vote; and partly because of gerrymandering -- "where Republicans have learned to capture state legislatures and then use innovative technology to draw districts where a Democrat could never be elected.

"Hence, the Republican House member only has to look over his right shoulder and moves much further to the right than the average voter in his or her district would want."
The same thing can happen in Democratic primaries, Schumer admitted -- "but at the moment, it is far more exaggerated on the Republican side."

Schumer said one way to "lessen the grip of the tea party on the electoral process" is to have a primary where voters of every party can vote, leading the top two vote-getters, regardless of their party affiliation, into a run-off.

"This would prevent a hard-right candidate from gaining office with only 22 percent of the vote. It would force the most extreme candidates in Republican districts to move closer to the middle to pick up more moderate Republicans and independents in order to be one of the top two vote-getters and enter the run off," he added.
Government is good
Schumer faulted Democrats for failing to counter tea party attempts "to make government the boogeyman."

Instead, Schumer made "tea party elites" the boogeyman, portraying them as "wealthy, hard right, selfish, narrow" and fearful of "an America that's not reflective of themselves." He said these "elites" have manipulated their millions of grass-roots followers into believing that "government is the explanation for their ills."

"Their mantra -- 'dramatically shrink government and our problems will end' -- is the fundamentally false, but not effectively challenged premise, that is the core weakness of the Tea Party, and one we can exploit to turn American politics around to the benefit of our nation."

Schumer said the best way to deal with the tea party's "obsessive anti-government mania" is to "confront it directly" and show people that they really do need government "to help them out of their morass."

Health care reform a mistake?

Schumer offered a number of examples where Democrats have failed to provide an "antidote" to the tea party's "quack medicine."

For instance, he said Democrats didn't do a good enough job explaining the nature, causes, severity of the financial crisis, nor did they "explain how the stimulus and government spending would help ameliorate the problem."

And after the financial crisis, Democrats turned to health care reform instead of income inequality: While healthcare reform "was a worthy goal," it wasn't a concern for most Americans, he admitted -- "they weren't focused on it because they weren't unhappy with the health care they had."

Schumer said Democrats must make the case that government helps Americans. "The average Tea Party member, like the average American, likes government-run Medicare, likes government-built highways, and likes government support for education, both higher and lower."

He said there are four ways that Democrats can "answer the Tea Party" and convince its followers that government is not always the problem and is "often the solution to middle-class woes."
-- First, Democrats must "stop playing defense and go on offense when it comes to the need for government. We must state loudly and repeatedly that we believe government is often a necessary force for good."

-- Second, Democrats in 2014 -- an election  year -- must focus "on four or five simple but compelling examples of where government can help the average family. (He mentioned raising the minimum wage, paying for college with a "simple, concerete government-funded program," increasing aid for K-12 education,infrastructure spending, equal pay for women, and fair trade.)

-- The third way to "constructively channel frustrations," Schumer said, "is to address the damage done by the Supreme Court's Citizen United decision," which created "huge holes in our campaign finance laws. ...Obviously, the Tea Party elites gained extraordinary influence by being able to funnel millions of dollars into campaigns with ads that distort the truth and attack government."

Schumer said although the House is controlled by Republicans, "there are many things that can be done administratively by the IRS and other government agencies -- we must redouble those efforts immediately."
- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-suggests-electoral-reform-way-lessen-grip-tea-party#sthash.uk4p19KM.dpuf

Schumer Suggests 'Electoral Reform' As Way to 'Lessen the Grip of the Tea Party'

January 24, 2014 - 9:54 AM
Schumer: Democrats Must 'Exploit' Tea Party Weakness to 'Turn American Politics Around'


Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) AP Photo
(CNSNews.com) - Although the tea party's influence is "undeniable," it is not inevitable -- and it must be crushed for the good of the nation, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) argued in a long political speech on Thursday.

"They've won elections, stymied Democratic priorities and taken a sledgehammer to programs that are important to tens of millions of Americans," he complained.

Among other recommendations, Schumer suggested an IRS crackdown on funding for tea party groups. "We have to look at electoral reform," he said.

"Our very electoral structure has been rigged to favor tea party candidates in Republican primaries, even when the district or the state may not be that red."

Schumer said "the tea party machine" has a particularly strong influence on Republican primaries, partly because the far right turns out to vote; and partly because of gerrymandering -- "where Republicans have learned to capture state legislatures and then use innovative technology to draw districts where a Democrat could never be elected.

"Hence, the Republican House member only has to look over his right shoulder and moves much further to the right than the average voter in his or her district would want."
The same thing can happen in Democratic primaries, Schumer admitted -- "but at the moment, it is far more exaggerated on the Republican side."

Schumer said one way to "lessen the grip of the tea party on the electoral process" is to have a primary where voters of every party can vote, leading the top two vote-getters, regardless of their party affiliation, into a run-off.

"This would prevent a hard-right candidate from gaining office with only 22 percent of the vote. It would force the most extreme candidates in Republican districts to move closer to the middle to pick up more moderate Republicans and independents in order to be one of the top two vote-getters and enter the run off," he added.
Government is good
Schumer faulted Democrats for failing to counter tea party attempts "to make government the boogeyman."

Instead, Schumer made "tea party elites" the boogeyman, portraying them as "wealthy, hard right, selfish, narrow" and fearful of "an America that's not reflective of themselves." He said these "elites" have manipulated their millions of grass-roots followers into believing that "government is the explanation for their ills."

"Their mantra -- 'dramatically shrink government and our problems will end' -- is the fundamentally false, but not effectively challenged premise, that is the core weakness of the Tea Party, and one we can exploit to turn American politics around to the benefit of our nation."

Schumer said the best way to deal with the tea party's "obsessive anti-government mania" is to "confront it directly" and show people that they really do need government "to help them out of their morass."

Health care reform a mistake?

Schumer offered a number of examples where Democrats have failed to provide an "antidote" to the tea party's "quack medicine."

For instance, he said Democrats didn't do a good enough job explaining the nature, causes, severity of the financial crisis, nor did they "explain how the stimulus and government spending would help ameliorate the problem."

And after the financial crisis, Democrats turned to health care reform instead of income inequality: While healthcare reform "was a worthy goal," it wasn't a concern for most Americans, he admitted -- "they weren't focused on it because they weren't unhappy with the health care they had."

Schumer said Democrats must make the case that government helps Americans. "The average Tea Party member, like the average American, likes government-run Medicare, likes government-built highways, and likes government support for education, both higher and lower."

He said there are four ways that Democrats can "answer the Tea Party" and convince its followers that government is not always the problem and is "often the solution to middle-class woes."
-- First, Democrats must "stop playing defense and go on offense when it comes to the need for government. We must state loudly and repeatedly that we believe government is often a necessary force for good."

-- Second, Democrats in 2014 -- an election  year -- must focus "on four or five simple but compelling examples of where government can help the average family. (He mentioned raising the minimum wage, paying for college with a "simple, concerete government-funded program," increasing aid for K-12 education,infrastructure spending, equal pay for women, and fair trade.)

-- The third way to "constructively channel frustrations," Schumer said, "is to address the damage done by the Supreme Court's Citizen United decision," which created "huge holes in our campaign finance laws. ...Obviously, the Tea Party elites gained extraordinary influence by being able to funnel millions of dollars into campaigns with ads that distort the truth and attack government."

Schumer said although the House is controlled by Republicans, "there are many things that can be done administratively by the IRS and other government agencies -- we must redouble those efforts immediately."
- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-suggests-electoral-reform-way-lessen-grip-tea-party#sthash.uk4p19KM.dpuf

Schumer Suggests 'Electoral Reform' As Way to 'Lessen the Grip of the Tea Party'

January 24, 2014 - 9:54 AM
Schumer: Democrats Must 'Exploit' Tea Party Weakness to 'Turn American Politics Around'


Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) AP Photo
(CNSNews.com) - Although the tea party's influence is "undeniable," it is not inevitable -- and it must be crushed for the good of the nation, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) argued in a long political speech on Thursday.

"They've won elections, stymied Democratic priorities and taken a sledgehammer to programs that are important to tens of millions of Americans," he complained.

Among other recommendations, Schumer suggested an IRS crackdown on funding for tea party groups. "We have to look at electoral reform," he said.

"Our very electoral structure has been rigged to favor tea party candidates in Republican primaries, even when the district or the state may not be that red."

Schumer said "the tea party machine" has a particularly strong influence on Republican primaries, partly because the far right turns out to vote; and partly because of gerrymandering -- "where Republicans have learned to capture state legislatures and then use innovative technology to draw districts where a Democrat could never be elected.

"Hence, the Republican House member only has to look over his right shoulder and moves much further to the right than the average voter in his or her district would want."
The same thing can happen in Democratic primaries, Schumer admitted -- "but at the moment, it is far more exaggerated on the Republican side."

Schumer said one way to "lessen the grip of the tea party on the electoral process" is to have a primary where voters of every party can vote, leading the top two vote-getters, regardless of their party affiliation, into a run-off.

"This would prevent a hard-right candidate from gaining office with only 22 percent of the vote. It would force the most extreme candidates in Republican districts to move closer to the middle to pick up more moderate Republicans and independents in order to be one of the top two vote-getters and enter the run off," he added.
Government is good
Schumer faulted Democrats for failing to counter tea party attempts "to make government the boogeyman."

Instead, Schumer made "tea party elites" the boogeyman, portraying them as "wealthy, hard right, selfish, narrow" and fearful of "an America that's not reflective of themselves." He said these "elites" have manipulated their millions of grass-roots followers into believing that "government is the explanation for their ills."

"Their mantra -- 'dramatically shrink government and our problems will end' -- is the fundamentally false, but not effectively challenged premise, that is the core weakness of the Tea Party, and one we can exploit to turn American politics around to the benefit of our nation."

Schumer said the best way to deal with the tea party's "obsessive anti-government mania" is to "confront it directly" and show people that they really do need government "to help them out of their morass."

Health care reform a mistake?

Schumer offered a number of examples where Democrats have failed to provide an "antidote" to the tea party's "quack medicine."

For instance, he said Democrats didn't do a good enough job explaining the nature, causes, severity of the financial crisis, nor did they "explain how the stimulus and government spending would help ameliorate the problem."

And after the financial crisis, Democrats turned to health care reform instead of income inequality: While healthcare reform "was a worthy goal," it wasn't a concern for most Americans, he admitted -- "they weren't focused on it because they weren't unhappy with the health care they had."

Schumer said Democrats must make the case that government helps Americans. "The average Tea Party member, like the average American, likes government-run Medicare, likes government-built highways, and likes government support for education, both higher and lower."

He said there are four ways that Democrats can "answer the Tea Party" and convince its followers that government is not always the problem and is "often the solution to middle-class woes."
-- First, Democrats must "stop playing defense and go on offense when it comes to the need for government. We must state loudly and repeatedly that we believe government is often a necessary force for good."

-- Second, Democrats in 2014 -- an election  year -- must focus "on four or five simple but compelling examples of where government can help the average family. (He mentioned raising the minimum wage, paying for college with a "simple, concerete government-funded program," increasing aid for K-12 education,infrastructure spending, equal pay for women, and fair trade.)

-- The third way to "constructively channel frustrations," Schumer said, "is to address the damage done by the Supreme Court's Citizen United decision," which created "huge holes in our campaign finance laws. ...Obviously, the Tea Party elites gained extraordinary influence by being able to funnel millions of dollars into campaigns with ads that distort the truth and attack government."

Schumer said although the House is controlled by Republicans, "there are many things that can be done administratively by the IRS and other government agencies -- we must redouble those efforts immediately."
- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-suggests-electoral-reform-way-lessen-grip-tea-party#sthash.uk4p19KM.dpuf

Arizona GOP CENSURES John McCain, Citing Liberal Voting Record - McCain Huddles With Soros

   The messy divorce plaguing Arizona Republicans and John McCain seems to be getting ugly. The Arizona Senator, whose voting record resembles Hilary Clinton's more than Ted Cruz, has embraced traditionally liberal platforms so aggressively, even the mainstream, machine Republican leadership feels forced to notice.
     McCain embraced funding for obamacare, angering the base, then inflamed it by wrapping his arms around immigration reform, which is nothing but a thinly veiled mass amnesty plan, sure to put millions of low income working Americans out of work.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_404h/2010-2019/Wires/Online/2014-01-26/AP/Images/McCain%20Censure.JPEG-0d3ae.jpg

Monday, January 20, 2014

Wendy Davis - Texas Liberal Abortion "Hero" - Lied About Most Important Facts

The liberal "heroine" of the Texas live birth abortion debate turns out to be a common liar. According to a flowery and glowing tribute, attempting to spin her lies away, as the truth begins to seep out, the Dallas Morning News lists several of her worst lies.

In the vein of barack obama, Wendy Davis has admitted falsifying the majority of her personal history. Davis even lied under oath, testifying in a federal lawsuit over redistricting that, "I got divorced by the time I was 19 years old," when in fact she was divorced at age 21.

http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/Breitbart/Big-Government/2013/Famous%20Local%20Politicians/wendy_davis_AP.jpg She met Jeff Davis, a lawyer 13 years older than her, married him and had a second daughter. He paid for her last two years at Texas Christian University and her time at Harvard Law School, and kept their two daughters while she was in Boston. When they divorced in 2005, he was granted parental custody, and the girls stayed with him. Wendy Davis was directed to pay child support.

Other outright lies include: her second husband paid her way through law school and she divorced him the day after the last payment was made; her ex-husband accused her in initial court filings of adultery, and was awarded custody of their two daughters; and she first ran for city council in Fort Worth as a Republican.

The women that wore an adult diaper to maintain a filibuster against placing limits on live birth abortions, lied about her divorce, life living in a single wide mobile home, being a single mom and paying her way through law school.

In fact, according to the Dallas, her ride to law school was paid in full be her husband. In typical leftist fashion, she filed for divorce, THE DAY AFTER he paid the final payment.

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1565255/thumbs/s-WENDY-DAVIS-large300.jpg Her ex husband was granted custody of her two girls and SHE was directed to pay HIM child support.

For more you can read the highly partisan report here:
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/headlines/20140118-as-wendy-davis-touts-life-story-in-race-for-governor-key-facts-blurred.ece

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Obama Oversees Creation of "Full Blown Police State" In America


http://www.cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/medium/images/Screen%20Shot%202013-12-19%20at%2010.06.38%20AM.pnghttp://www.cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/medium/images/Screen%20Shot%202013-12-19%20at%2010.06.45%20AM.png
     According to the slides from DOJ/FBI/DEA policy, the agencies are directed to engage in a "preplanned and programmed policy of perjury." Agents are instructed to hide the details of illegal gathering of information and how it is used to illegally prosecute thousands of citizens.
     NSA Official, Bill Binney warned a year ago that the direction the NSA and DOJ were taking surveillance brought the US to the edge of a police state. Now in an interview with the Washington Post, Binney describes how the crimes being committed in the name of "national security" are cementing police state tactics and policies throughout the US government.
     Said Binney,
    
Bill Binney is the high-level NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information. A 32-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency, Binney was the senior technical director within the agency and managed thousands of NSA employees.
Binney has been interviewed by virtually all of the mainstream media, including CBS, ABC, CNN, New York Times, USA Today, Fox News, PBS and many others.
Last year, Binney held his thumb and forefinger close together, and said:
We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state.
But today, Binney told Washington’s Blog that the U.S. has already become a police state.
By way of background, the government is spying on virtually everything we do.
All of the information gained by the NSA through spying is then shared with federal, state and local agencies, and they are using that information to prosecute petty crimes such as drugs and taxes. The agencies are instructed to intentionally “launder” the information gained through spying, i.e. to pretend that they got the information in a more legitimate way … and to hide that from defense attorneys and judges.
 http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/12/former-top-nsa-official-now-police-state.html

NSA Official: 'We Are Now a Police State'

December 19, 2013 - 10:54 AM
Last year, high-ranking NSA official Bill Binney said, “We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state.” Now, Binney says that the U.S. has already become a full-blown police state.
Binney told Washington’s Blog on Wednesday that:
“The main use of the collection from these [NSA spying] programs [is] for law enforcement.
- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/nsa-official-we-are-now-police-state#sthash.LOUz0Dxo.xF1q3WYv.dpuf

NSA Official: 'We Are Now a Police State'

December 19, 2013 - 10:54 AM
Last year, high-ranking NSA official Bill Binney said, “We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state.” Now, Binney says that the U.S. has already become a full-blown police state.
Binney told Washington’s Blog on Wednesday that:
“The main use of the collection from these [NSA spying] programs [is] for law enforcement.
- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/nsa-official-we-are-now-police-state#sthash.LOUz0Dxo.xF1q3WYv.dpuf

NSA Official: 'We Are Now a Police State'

December 19, 2013 - 10:54 AM
Last year, high-ranking NSA official Bill Binney said, “We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state.” Now, Binney says that the U.S. has already become a full-blown police state.
Binney told Washington’s Blog on Wednesday that:
“The main use of the collection from these [NSA spying] programs [is] for law enforcement.
- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/nsa-official-we-are-now-police-state#sthash.LOUz0Dxo.xF1q3WYv.dpuf

NSA Official: 'We Are Now a Police State'

December 19, 2013 - 10:54 AM
Last year, high-ranking NSA official Bill Binney said, “We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state.” Now, Binney says that the U.S. has already become a full-blown police state.
Binney told Washington’s Blog on Wednesday that:
“The main use of the collection from these [NSA spying] programs [is] for law enforcement.
- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/nsa-official-we-are-now-police-state#sthash.LOUz0Dxo.xF1q3WYv.dpuf

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Democrat Senator Udall Asked State to Fabricate Obamacare Numbers

   During a time when distrust of the federal government is very high, no one is particularly surprised to learn a government official asked a state government to fabricate obamacare numbers to buoy support for the dying program. That the person in question is a US Senator is extremely troubling.
    Coming on the heels of disclosure that the Obama administration intentionally invented numbers to portray unemployment as much lower than reality, and the NSA refuses to disclose if they are stealing the communications and recording the phone calls of members of the United States Congress, people are turning away in disgust.
     The recent discovery that the obama administration appointed a donor/supporter to head up the "investigation" into IRS targeting of conservative groups and individuals in the run up to the 2012 election causes many to simply conclude that the current government is bereft of integrity, honor and any sense of decency.
 http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/Breitbart/Big-Government/2014/01/09/20130228__mark_udall_colorado_senator_p1.jpg
     CompleteColorado.com reports that emails show U.S. Senator Mark Udall's (D-CO) office pressured the Colorado Division of Insurance to downplay the number of insurance cancellations caused by the rollout of ObamaCare. A full 249,199 Colorado citizens were victimized by ObamaCare's cancellations. According to the emails, Udall's office hoped to change the definition of a "cancellation" as a way to lower the number. All of this occurred late last year as the storm around cancellations was engulfing Democrats and the president.
From an email inside the Colorado Division of Insurance (DOI), Director of External Affairs Jo Donlin bluntly stated to her colleagues:
Sen. Udall says our numbers were wrong. They are not wrong. Cancellation notices affected 249,199 people. They want to trash our numbers. I’m holding strong while we get more details. Many have already done early renewals. Regardless, they received cancellation notices.
Donlin’s email was sent November 14.
     Udall won his Senate seat with only 53% of the vote in 2008, a wave year for Democrats. The Senator is up for what many believe will be a tough re-election bid in 2014, and in a purple state that everyday feels more red than blue.