Marco Rubio Amnesty Bill Includes BILLIONS in Unrelated Pork

     The unlimited chutzpa of Bernie Sanders, Harry Reid, Chuck Schummer, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and others, with regards to the immigration amnesty charade, that was passed by the Senate, today is only exceeded by the lies Marco Rubio is willing to tell to defend it.
     America's treasury is being  looted by the Senate, as they add every imaginable pork barrel item, from obama-phones to free automobiles. From get out of jail free cards, to $5,000 a year incentives for America corporations to hire aliens, instead of citizens.
 
     Marco Rubio, the father and mentor of this assault against American workers and taxpayers, has put forth a lie so big, even telling it risks being labeled some kind of conspiracy nut. His sell out is complete, without conscience, devoid of integrity and truly criminal.
     The US Senate passed the bill, in a Christmas party style session, complete with chanting in the galleries and cheering on the Senate floor. No one appeared more proud of their deceit than Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who took to the airways trying to spin his pork barrel express, as important, necessary and honest. He lied about all three and no doubt, permanently damaged his career, as the right half of the Republican Party seems to have written him off as another scoundrel, liar, and self obsessed fool striving to buy votes with our money.
     The TEA Party of Florida condemns Marco Rubio's pork barrel pig of a bill and condemns the lies, back stabbing and whoring out his office in search of Hispanic support in 2016.

Where is DHS When Islamic Socialist Party Website Places BOUNTY on Ameican Citizens?

     Still Think The Federal Persecution of TEA Party Groups is on par with the federal surveillance of fundamental Muslim groups?
     A search of the internet uncovers astounding Fundamental Islamist groups plotting to go after American web site administrators deemed "Infidels." These Islomfascist organizations have placed WANTED posters on their sites advertising huge cash rewards for the home address and other personal information of these people.

     Schuyler Montague reports on his web site:  While researching our story yesterday on the recent removal of Counterjihad pages by Facebook, we uncovered some very disturbing information.  In an attempt to locate the source of the Islamic onslaught against the freedom of expression, we ventured down the rabbit hole of Islamic hate.  And what we discovered when we got there, tucked away in a dark corner, was a website operated by a terrorist organization called the Islamic Socialist Network.

     It didn’t take very long to figure out once we located the website under the name of the “Union Star Network” that we were dealing with something much bigger than a 20-year-old muslim boy in his mom’s basement.  And, if there were any doubts, they quickly faded when we saw photos of Facebook page administrators on “Wanted” posters, offering cash rewards of up to $1 Million for personal information such as residential addresses.

     It appears that the Islamic Socialist Network has created a “Hit List” of  Counterjihad webpages to attack.  And, if this wasn’t bad enough, we discovered this hit list also extends to the administrators of these webpages, as well.  The first page on the Islamic Socialist Network’s website  is dedicated to eliminating the site belonging to “Ban Islam” and the second page is dedicated to eliminating the site “Your Daily Muslim (YDM.)”  If you scroll down their pages you will find the “Wanted” posters that we have placed below. 

     This terrorist network has obviously initiated a coordinated plan of attack.  These first couple pictures are on their page dedicated to the website “Ban Islam”

 http://shariaunveiled.wordpress.com/2013/06/25/islamic-terrorist-organization-places-bounty-on-infidel-webpage-administrators/

IRS Chief Admits Inappropriate Screening Was Broad

The Internal Revenue Service's screening of groups seeking tax-exempt status was broader and lasted longer than has been previously disclosed, the new head of the agency said Monday.

 

In a conference call with reporters, Danny Werfel said that after becoming acting IRS chief last month, he discovered wide-ranging and improper terms on lists screeners were still using to choose groups for careful examinations. He did not specify what terms were on the lists, but said he suspended the use of all such lists immediately.
"There was a wide-ranging set of categories and cases that spanned a broad spectrum" on the lists, Werfel said. He added that his aides found those lists contained "inappropriate criteria that was in use."

 http://bigstory.ap.org/article/new-irs-chief-inappropriate-screening-was-broader

Obama Administration Spying on Top Judges, Generals and Politicians?

Bush-Era NSA Whistleblower Makes Most Explosive Allegations Yet About Extent of Gov’t Surveillance         and You Won’t Believe Who He Says They Spied On

     Ever since the Obamacare USSC ruling came down, people have wondered how Chief Justice John Roberts got it so wrong. What if he didn't but was blackmailed be the Obama Administration, using meta data gathered by the NSA? Illegal Spying and blackmail in DC? Doesn't sound too far fetched anymore.

       Russ Tice, a former intelligence analyst and Bush-era NSA whistleblower, claimed Wednesday that the intelligence community has ordered surveillance on a wide range of groups and individuals, including high-ranking military officials, lawmakers and diplomats. He also made another stunning allegation. He says the NSA had ordered wiretaps on phones connected to then-Senate candidate Barack Obama back in 2004. “They went after–and I know this because I had my hands literally on the paperwork for these sort of things–they went after high-ranking military officers; they went after members of Congress, both Senate and the House, especially on the intelligence committees and on the armed services committees and some of the–and judicial,” Tice told Peter B. Collins on Boiling Frog Post News.

He went on: “But they went after other ones, too. They went after lawyers and law firms. All kinds of–heaps of lawyers and law firms. They went after judges. One of the judges is now sitting on the Supreme Court that I had his wiretap information in my hand. Two are former FISA court judges. They went after State Department officials. They went after people in the executive service that were part of the White House–their own people.”

Then Tice dropped the bombshell about Obama.

“Here’s the big one,” he said. “[T]his was in summer of 2004, one of the papers that I held in my hand was to wiretap a bunch of numbers associated with a 40-something-year-old wannabe senator for Illinois. You wouldn’t happen to know where that guy lives right now would you? It’s a big white house in Washington, D.C. That’s who they went after, and that’s the president of the United States now.”

 http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/20/bush-era-nsa-whistleblower-makes-most-explosive-allegations-yet-about-true-extent-of-govt-surveillance/

Whatever Happened to "I Will Not vote For The Bill If It Doesn't Include Border Security?"

     Marco Rubio, not content with surgical destruction of the American economy, is celebrating the expected Senate passage of the Gang of Eight, amnesty bill.
     Odd how Marco has thrown in, so tightly with Obama and the White House as report of Obama RUNNING the Gang of Eight, keep coming out.

The White House is playing a larger role in developing the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill than its supporters publicly admit, according to a forthcoming article in The New Yorker.
“‘No decisions are being made without talking to us about it,’ the official said of the Gang of Eight negotiations … ‘This does not fly if we’re not O.K. with it,’” a senior Obama official told author Ryan Lizza for the pending article.
White House officials also believe the emerging bill will be a huge success for President Barack Obama.
“If a Gang of Eight-style bill is signed into law by the President, it will probably be one of the top five legislative accomplishments in the last twenty years,” the official said. “It’s a huge piece of business.”
The report points out other evidence of close White House involvement.     http://weaselzippers.us/2013/06/17/report-obama-quietly-running-amnesty-bill-from-white-house-has-control-over-gang-of-ocho/

Rubio, who had a staffer make the following statement, Sunday, slandering American workers and pretending the sham amnesty bill would address employment competition;“There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.”

 

Obama Adminstration Spins Spying Facts To Cover Excesses

 
 A bus passes by a poster of Edward Snowden, a former contractor at the National Security Agency (NSA), displayed by his supporters at Hong Kong's financial Central district during the midnight hours of June 18, 2013. Reuters/Bobby Yip

     If you are an American citizen, a single WARRANTLESS wiretap of your phone, e-mail, or social media account is TOO MANY. Apparently, if you are the Obama Administration, 10,000 separate demands for your private Facebook information and 7,000 separate demands for your private information on Microsoft platforms is incidental and minor.

     The lack of ethics, honesty, integrity and  decency shown by the Obama Administration throughout this process, smacks of the worst things about Big Brother, or in the case of Janet Napolitano, Big Sister. That neither of these persons has the integrity to take responsibility, admit the truth, deal with the facts and even pretend to be fair, tells us all we need to know about their integrity, honesty and decency.
As former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich says, "Obama lied about spying, then lied about lying, then lied about the lies."

Obama's Snooping Excludes Mosques, Missed Boston Bombers

     Headlines remind us that President Obama "Strongly Objects" to religious liberty for American servicemen and women but when it comes to Muslims, he is very strongly moved on behalf of their religious "sensitivities."
     The all knowing, all seeing, NSA, claims that $100 billion plus per year, spent collecting YOUR phone records, credit card data and intimate details of your life are winning the "war" on terror, yet the Obama regime ordered a stop on all surveillance on mosques and other Muslim gathering places.
     As a result, the FBI INTENTIONALLY ignored warnings from Russia, about the Boston bombers, while claiming the assault against American citizens privacy is vital to national security. It seems obvious to everyone but the clown princes of politics, that the actions and inaction of the national security machines conspired to bring about the dead and wounded at the Boston Marathon.
     Where's the disconnect, here? The Obama regime is clearly placing the agenda of Islamics ahead of the civil rights and privacy of American citizens and doing it right before our eyes, while demanding no one notice.
     It is time for President Obama to step aside. The damage he's doing and has done is staggering. It will take generations to reverse the assault on liberty, civil rights, privacy, religious liberty and decency brought about by this administration.

Homeland Insecurity: The White House assures that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is to stop terrorists, and yet it won't snoop in mosques, where the terrorists are.
That's right, the government's sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes the jihad factories where homegrown terrorists are radicalized.
Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover string operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.
Who makes up this body, and how do they decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret.
We do know the panel was set up under pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at mosques. Just months before the panel's formation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.
Before mosques were excluded from the otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland.
If only they were allowed to continue, perhaps the many victims of the Boston Marathon bombings would not have lost their lives and limbs. The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks, and it did not check out the radical Boston mosque where the Muslim bombers worshipped.
The bureau didn't even contact mosque leaders for help in identifying their images after those images were captured on closed-circuit TV cameras and cellphones.
One of the Muslim bombers made extremist outbursts during worship, yet because the mosque wasn't monitored, red flags didn't go off inside the FBI about his increasing radicalization before the attacks.
This is particularly disturbing in light of recent independent surveys of American mosques, which reveal some 80% of them preach violent jihad or distribute violent literature to worshippers.
What other five-alarm jihadists are counterterrorism officials missing right now, thanks to restrictions on monitoring the one area they should be monitoring?

Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/061213-659753-all-intrusive-obama-terror-dragnet-excludes-mosques.htm#ixzz2W6iTTPEY
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

The Two Faces of Marco Rubio

Amnesty - Is It The Road to Pennsylvania Avenue, or Ruin for Rubio?

    Rebecca Kaplan, of the National Journal, spent half an hour with me last week, discussing Marco Rubio and his incomprehensible embrace of amnesty for illegal aliens. Given the news of Marco's flip flop on border security and never ending shifting about of his "core" principles on this bill, it is impossible to nail down just where Marco stands with regard to what is best for America and what is best for Marco Rubio's presidential aspirations.
0
 The Florida senator is trying to be both a high-level negotiator and a disappointed populist. With the immigration bill, he’ll eventually have to choose.

In a radio interview Tuesday with conservative talk-show host Hugh Hewitt, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., drew a line in the sand. Asked whether he would vote for the Senate’s immigration overhaul if certain border-security provisions were not adopted, he said no. “If those amendments don’t pass, then I think we’ve got a bill that isn’t going to become law, and I think we’re wasting our time,” he said.
Rubio hardly sounded like one of the senators who helped craft the immigration-reform package behind closed doors. He was, after all, brought into the “Gang of Eight” to help sell, not sink, the legislation with conservative lawmakers. Instead, he sounded like Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, who got his tech-friendly amendments included during a markup because he was seen as the only Republican on the Judiciary Committee who might vote for the legislation.
This is how Rubio’s immigration dance has gone—and will likely continue to go until the final vote on the Senate floor. Rubio is playing both the ultimate insider’s game (crafting a major piece of legislation with a small group of lawmakers) and the ultimate outsider’s game (trying to build public pressure to sway the legislation in a more conservative direction). On the issue of immigration, he’s trying to be just a little bit pregnant. “I hope he knows what he’s doing,” says Jim Manley, a former aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., “because he’s playing a very dangerous game with immense implications not only toward the immigration bill but for his 2016 presidential chances as well.”
The other members of the Gang of Eight may not care about Rubio’s presidential ambitions, but since those ambitions appear to have helped keep him involved, they’ve given him space. Despite Rubio’s public kvetching about the bill (he said again Monday that it doesn’t have the 60 votes it needs to pass), his rhetorical meandering has drawn no public or private complaints from his fellow bill writers or their aides. They know he’s their best, if not only, shot at picking up conservative votes in the Senate and House—and wooing conservative media that influence the base. If a handful of Republican senators ultimately vote for the bill, it’s not going to be because Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., won them over.
Rubio knows it, too. “One of the reasons why I was asked to even join this effort is to help bring Republicans on board, and that’s what I’m trying to do,” he told reporters Wednesday after briefing members of the Republican Study Committee on the bill and the ways he thinks it should be improved. Asked if he had any problem with Rubio criticizing a bill he had already signed onto, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told National Journal, “He’s done a great job selling this to the conservative talk-show hosts and the conservative community.”
And Rubio seems, at least for the moment, to be adhering to principles the gang laid out to guide the bill. Yes, he favors an amendment that would task Congress, not the Homeland Security Department, with writing the plan to secure the U.S.-Mexico border. But he hasn’t insisted that Congress vote to certify that the border has been secured before the green-card process for formerly illegal immigrants can begin. “We welcome amendments that’ll improve the bill and broaden support for the bill, provided it doesn’t get at our core principles, and Marco Rubio is very aware of our core principles. I talk to him every day,” Schumer said diplomatically. He was remarkably cheerful when he spoke to reporters Tuesday in spite of the fact that Rubio had just told Fox & Friends that the bill didn’t have the votes to pass.
Rubio’s White House ambitions complicate his posture. His best-case scenario is to be seen as the critical negotiator who pulled the bill rightward to secure Republican votes for bipartisan passage. He certainly can’t be seen as Schumer’s lapdog, a charge that some of the bill’s opponents are trying to level against him. But almost no one believes that Rubio’s public criticism means he’s walking away from the bill, because a failed reform effort could potentially hurt him as much as a centrist one. “Is it in his interest to demand changes that become impossible for the Democrats to accept in a way that blows up the bill?” asks Frank Sharry, the executive director of America’s Voice, a group that supports the bill. “No. The only way out is to be the guy that helps produce a bill, landmark legislation, that saves the Republican Party from itself.”
Rubio has a history of “walking carefully on critical issues,” says Susan MacManus, a political-science professor at the University of South Florida. She points to Rubio’s delicate embrace of populist tea-party groups in Florida that helped propel his come-from-behind victory during the 2010 election, even though he had been speaker of the Florida House. At the same time, she says, “He was wary of becoming too embedded into something which clearly had a strong ideological bent to it.”
Now some of those same groups that got him elected are seething at his work on immigration reform, which they see as a repeat of the Affordable Care Act, at least in size and scope. “We’re not going to support any candidate for any office who’s in favor of this bill, and that’s nonnegotiable,” says John Long, chairman of the Tea Party of Florida. “We’ve tried to communicate that to him, but his head is on Pennsylvania Avenue. It’s not on Main Street anymore.” Rubio’s insider-outsider split on immigration is part of the theater that comes with a successful political career.

This article appears in the June 8, 2013, edition of National Journal as In & Out.
 http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/the-two-faces-of-marco-rubio-20130606?mrefid=site_search

The Secretary Shall Determine That Someone Lives and Someone Dies

Time To DEFUND Obamacare

June 5, 2013

• 0 0 0 0Share 0
  digg
• 
  

BY JORGE BONILLA
Yesterday we had the opportunity to see the devastating effects of ObamaCare’s most odious line (which appears 764 times throughout the legislative text) on the most vulnerable among us. Sarah Murnaghan’s fight should serve to open our eyes, so that we may see what horror is wrought when Congress abdicates its oversight power to an unelected, unnacountable bureaucracy- and in so doing, vests it with the power to decide life and death.
For those who may not yet know, Sarah Murnaghan is a 10-year-old girl from Pennsylvania, who suffers from end-stage Cystic Fibrosis. She needs a lung transplant, and is on the UNOS waiting list. Unfortunately, child donor lungs are extremely rare, and the cut-off age for adult lungs is 12. Sarah is medically eligible to receive adult donor lungs, but can not be placed on that list due to current UNOS/HHS policy.
In response to U.S. Representative Lou Barletta’s (R-PA11) impassioned plea to make the policy change that could save young Sarah’s life, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Kathleen Sebelius indicated that she is unable to unilaterally change policy to save a child’s life. Appalingly, she did so while making the cavalier assertion that “someone lives, someone dies“. By not taking any action, the Secretary has, in fact, determined that someone dies.
The whole purpose of our Founding was to get out from under the yoke of arbitrary rule and to enable subsequent generations of Americans to enjoy the fullest measure of their God-given freedoms, yet here we are. We are fond of calling for executive measures that restrict our freedoms, under the moral cover of the possibility that such a measure may save one child’s life. Well, Secretary Sebelius punted when faced with that very option.


http://shark-tank.net/2013/06/05/the-secretary-shall-determine-that-someone-lives-and-someone-dies/

A Government That Threatens the Press is not a Government, it is a Regime.

     It was just a week ago that journalists, after meeting with  scandal ridden Attorney General Eric Holder, reported that, "The Attorney General Gave Us PERMISSION to Say He Supports Freedom of the Press."

     The Attorney General of a Republic does not have the power to give permission to the press to do their job. Those are the actions of a despotic regime and require immediate action, including impeachment and indictment.


Glenn Greenwald, a columnist on civil liberties and US national security issues for the Guardian, spoke with Piers Morgan last night on the top secret PRISM program that has direct access to servers of firms including Google, Facebook and Apple.
Greenwald told Piers Morgan the Obama administration “has been very aggressive about bullying and threatening anybody” who thinks about exposing the program.

“There is a massive apparatus within the United States government that with complete secrecy has been building this enormous structure that has only one goal,” Greenwald said on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Live” on Thursday.

“And that is to destroy privacy and anonymity not just in the United States but around the world.”
Greenwald’s subsequent comments came just hours after The Guardian and The Washington Post both broke another bombshell report detailing a program dubbed as “PRISM.” According to the reports, the program involves the National Security Agency and FBI tapping into the servers of nine leading Internet companies to extract information.
Greenwald jump-started Thursday’s discussion over civil liberties and government surveillance with a report late Wednesday night that detailed the NSA’s collection of data from millions of Americans’ phone records.
“It’s well past time that we have a debate about whether that’s the kind of country and world in which we want to live,” Greenwald said on CNN. “We haven’t had that debate because it’s all done in secrecy and the Obama administration has been very aggressive about bullying and threatening anybody who thinks about exposing it or writing about it or even doing journalism about it. It’s well past time that that come to an end.”

A chart prepared by the NSA, contained within the top-secret document obtained by the Guardian, underscores the breadth of the data it is able to obtain: email, video and voice chat, videos, photos, voice-over-IP (Skype, for example) chats, file transfers, social networking details, and more. (The Guardian)

 http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06/greenwald-obama-administration-has-been-very-aggressive-about-bullying-threatening-journalists-who-think-about-exposing-prism-video/

Obama Administration Acting Like Characters In A Spy Novel

DHS insider: It’s about to get very ugly

By Douglas J. Hagmann

7 June 2013: Something quite unexpected happened just hours ago, in the dark of night, during a two-day layover in Washington, DC. My son and I are scheduled to take part in a seminar outside of Raleigh, North Carolina this weekend, so we combined our travels to include a side-trip to DC for a business meeting we had previously arranged. It was during this layover that something seemingly ripped from the pages of a spy novel took place.

While I was in the middle of a perfectly good and well needed sleep in the very early hours of this morning, I received a message. I cannot disclose how I received this message, at least not now. The discerning reader will understand why, which, by the way, would make a very interesting story alone. The message was extremely clear and precise. I was to meet my high level DHS insider at a very specific location in Washington, DC at a time when most “normal” people, except third-shift workers are still asleep. And, I was to come alone and make certain that I was not being followed, and I was to leave any cell phone or electronic device behind.

Seriously? I thought, as I was still trying to make sense of it all. Is all this really necessary? Is this really happening? I considered waking my son to accompany me, but opted to follow the instructions to the letter. Besides, I thought, he’s not the most affable middle-of-the-night person. I left a hastily written but detailed note in my hotel room before my departure in the event something happened. I looked at the digital clock on my rental car (my personal car would never survive our long distance trip). It was 3:20 a.m.

The meeting

I felt like I was part of a spy movie set in our nation’s capital. A chill rose up my spine as I waited in the dark of a chilly, misty and foggy pre-dawn morning. I was to meet with my DHS insider source at a time when most of the nation is asleep, at a place I could swear was featured in the movie All the President’s Men. No one and I mean no one knows I’m here, I thought, as I could see one of the most recognizable national landmarks in the distance.

My source appeared out of nowhere, or so it seemed, and handed me a cup of coffee with the astute observation that I looked like I needed it. So tell me, I asked impatiently, why do we have to meet at this time, at this location, and under such specific circumstances? “Because this might be our last meeting,” he stated.

Maybe it was the lack of sleep, the time, the place, or the chill of the misty rain that caused my sense of foreboding. “Explain,” I asked in an almost demanding tone. So he did, without mincing words.

The details

“If anyone thinks that what’s going on right now with all of this surveillance of American citizens is to fight some sort of foreign enemy, they’re delusional. If people think that this ‘scandal’ can’t get any worse, it will, hour by hour, day by day. This has the ability to bring down our national leadership, the administration and other senior elected officials working in collusion with this administration, both Republican and Democrats. People within the NSA, the Department of Justice, and others, they know who they are, need to come forth with the documentation of ‘policy and practice’ in their possession, disclose what they know, fight what’s going on, and just do their job. I have never seen anything like this, ever. The present administration is going after leakers, media sources, anyone and everyone who is even suspected of ‘betrayal.” That’s what they call it, ‘betrayal.’ Can you believe the size of their cahones? This administration considers anyone telling the truth about Benghazi, the IRS, hell, you name the issue, ‘betrayal,’” he said.

“We know all this already,” I stated. He looked at me, giving me a look like I’ve never seen, and actually pushed his finger into my chest. “You don’t know jack,” he said, “this is bigger than you can imagine, bigger than anyone can imagine. This administration is collecting names of sources, whistle blowers and their families, names of media sources and everybody they talk to and have talked to, and they already have a huge list. If you’re not working for MSNBC or CNN, you’re probably on that list. If you are a website owner with a brisk readership and a conservative bent, you’re on that list. It’s a political dissident list, not an enemy threat list,” he stated.

“What’s that exactly mean, being on that list, that is,” I asked, trying to make sense of it all.

“It means that there will be censorship under the color of authority of anyone in the U.S. who is attempting to expose what’s going on in our name. It’s about controlling any damning information from reaching epidemic proportions. It’s damage control to the extreme. It’s about the upcoming censorship of the internet in the name of national security. The plans are already in place. These latest reports about “spying eyes” have turned this administration and others connected to it into something very, very dangerous. They feel cornered and threatened, and I’m hearing about some plans they have to shut down the flow of information that is implicating them of wrongdoing. Time is short,” he stated.

“How are they going to do this? How is it even possible?” I asked.

“First, they intend to use the Justice Department to silence journalists like in the Rosen case, but they won’t stop there. They will use a host of national security policies, laws, letters, whatever to take out the bigger threats,” he stated.

Next, they will use some sort of excuse, an external threat, and I believe it will be a combination of the economic collapse and a Mid-East war that will begin in Syria to throttle the information that is accessible on the Internet. And you know what? People will believe it!”

Based on what I’ve seen, most of which I should not have seen, the DHS is co-ordinating efforts with other federal agencies to begin to threaten American citizens with incarceration for non-compliance. You know the old talk of color coded lists? Well, this is what they will be using. People exposing the truth about Benghazi, killing the U.S. Dollar, even those questioning Obama’s legal status and eligibility to be President are the current targets. And they’ve had five long years to get to this point. The ugly truth is that these policies and practices did not start under Obama, but long before. This is about the killing of our Constitutional Republic. The murder of our country and the stripping of our rights. While many have been preoccupied with one issue, few have seen the bigger issue. This is the ‘end game,’ for all the marbles,” he stated.

More to come

“Please,” pleaded my source, “get this information out while you can. Tell people what I’m saying, that we don’t have much time, that after the latest exposure of spying, Obama, Jarrett, Axelrod, and others, including members of Congress, have put their plans into high gear. This is about the Marxist takeover of America. This is about our country being able to survive another July 4^th holiday. This is about a world war about to break out that will kill millions of people, all because of the agenda of this administration.”

“They are very dangerous and will do anything and everything to stop the onslaught of negative information that’s being reported by the main stream media. But only about one quarter of the real information is being reported. The other three quarters will be the game changer. But first, tell people what I’ve said. Let them know that more will follow but get this information out right now while the internet is still relatively free. Do it today.”

My source provided additional information, but I am abiding by his wish to get this much out. I am writing now to let people know that we are in for seriously dangerous times ahead.  Deadly times. War, and censorship under the color of authority and under the pretext of of national security. It’s about to get a lot uglier. 

Stay tuned.

 http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/8562

NSA Caught Spying on Millions of Americans

NSA's Verizon Spying Order Specifically Targeted Americans, Not Foreigners

  Top secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over all call data shows scale of domestic surveillance under Obama

      The Obama Administration scandals keep coming and the main stream media keep playing catch up. It is beyond convenient that the MSM failed to break even one of the six scandals swirling around the abuses at the DOJ, NSA, White House and State Department.

      The newest scandal plaguing an administration and Attorney General teetering on the brink, involves wholesale government spying on citizens with no possible connection to terrorism, terrorists, funding of terror cells, or anything other than their potential conservative opinions. Obama, as always, seems content to pretend he just discovered the latest round of government abuse by reading the New York Times. Truth be told, the only section of the NYT he would be interested in reading, would be the section covering Hollywood celebrities.

     America must look much closer at who is spying on us, what data they wish to collect and why. It is time to consider a change at the top, to protect us from further abuse, of a government off the rails.

 

 

 
An aerial view of the NSA's Utah Data Center in Bluffdale, Utah, Thursday, June 6, 2013. The government is secretly collecting the telephone records of millions of U.S. customers of Verizon under a top-secret court order, according to the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The Obama administration is defending the National Security Agency's need to collect such records, but critics are calling it a huge over-reach.

 

Obama Appoints Scandal Ridden, Susan Rice New National Security Advisor

Obama attempts end run around congressional investigation.

In a move solely to try and tamp down the momentum gaining ground, to find out who ordered an entire administration to lie about the slaughter of our Ambassador and three US Citizens in Benghazi, on the anniversary of 9/11, President Obama intends to appoint of Susan Rice, chief among the liars pretending the Embassy attack was the result of a you tube video, even after all evidence proved it a lie.
If nothing else, America will be safe from nonexistent you tube violence and the president will be further damaged as Americans realize what lengths this  administration will go to avoid the light of day shining on their crimes.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20130605/DA6NI1LG0.html

American Muslim Political Action Committee Calls Million Muslim March on DC

We Are America and We Do Not Cower! 

On September 11, 2013 - Twelfth anniversary of the Islamic Fundamentalist Attack on America, AMPAC, the American Muslim Political Action Committee, plans a Million MUSLIM March on Washington, DC.This is no different than the ground zero mosque, project.
Time to put TWO MILLION TEA Party Americans in their path.

http://eventful.com/washington/events/million-muslim-march-white-house-91113-ampac-/E0-001-052957548-4